Unfortunately they don't work very well for our purposes. And then there is the fact that what you compose looks almost nothing like the final output - as a manual HTML author you must constantly switch between a display view and composing view.įor all the above reasons and more, WYSIWYG editors for HTML are now the norm and there are many commercial and open-source options. If you attempt to do this in many cases you will wind up spending as much time or more fiddling with the HTML as you do writing the actual content. Also burdensome is the need to match opening and closing tags… I don't think anyone wants to write HTML by hand - they do it on occasion when making a website - but not for the content that makes up the articles on the site. They are also error-prone as they are sometimes lengthy and require significant effort to type with the correct syntax. The tags that specify paragraphs, line breaks, headings, boldface, lists, images, links, and just about everything else beyond plain text are a major distraction at best. It may be obvious but a brief discussion of the reasons is worthwhile. While I'm sure most people would not advocate it generally, writing HTML by hand is painstaking and laborious. To illustrate, let's consider the two ways you can create HTML - manually in a text editor or via a WYSIWYG editor. To clarify my original statement: HTML does not work well for the casual user quickly composing notes. But for writing notes, it is less than ideal to put it mildly. I love HTML and it's truly a pillar of the modern world. I hope this will be enlightening in that regard. While the overwhelming majority of feedback on the new editor has been positive, I think it's not completely clear to everyone why we went with Markdown as the underlying format. I started composing a response and wound up with a rather lengthy discussion on the drawbacks of using HTML to write notes and the benefits of Markdown which I decided to convert into this blog post. This was justifiably met with some rather civilized disagreement as being inaccurate and overly broad. HTML was never intended as a medium for composing text in and the fundamental design of it has severe limitations that make it extremely clumsy to adapt to that purpose. In a recent post responding to one of our customers about why we developed Markdown editor for TheBrain, I rather bluntly stated:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |